From Channel News Asia:
(bold fonts are edited by me)
More underage teens in S'pore see casual sex as acceptable
By Hetty Musfirah Abdul Khamid, Channel NewsAsia
31 October 2009 1945 hrs
More underage teenagers in Singapore view casual sex as being normal and acceptable.
The Attorney General, Professor Walter Woon, addressed this issue at the third Children's Society Lecture on Saturday.
He said the job for the prosecution becomes even tougher when two minors engage in casual sex.
Modern technology and the Internet have played a part in the changing mindsets of young people in Singapore.
Carol Balhetchet, director of youth services, Singapore Children's Society, said: "The media in various forms is giving that message that it's cool to be quite open about your sexuality. They tend to experiment and try out, literally try it out, and if you are not in the group that has tried it out, then you are not cool."
Prof Woon said young people are becoming more open with their sexuality, with some even thinking that casual sex is inevitable. As such, legal cases that are emerging have become complex, with some minors even going to the extent of soliciting sexual services.
Prof Woon said: "As what I see from some of the cases that come across my desk, they go out and solicit these contacts. In one case, she solicited it in her own home, not far from where I live.....It is not just the girls, but the boys (too)... male prostitute who went on the Internet, gay chatroom to earn money...."
When it comes to cases involving two minors engaging in casual sex, Prof Woon said the law may not be enough to deal with the issue. "It is not easy and this is where the NGOs, the community services play a part. Obviously, it is not just for the judges. The judges cannot do very much by themselves.
"There has to be some follow-up. Even if you send the boy to jail, or the girl to jail, or both of them to jail, there has got to be something done.
"Sending them to jail per se would not make them reflect on their lives. That is the last thing that is going to happen. But good or ill, this is the framework that we have."
The problem of underage teenagers engaging in sexual activities have seen an upward trend in recent years.
Cases involving consensual sex with a girl under 14, which amounts to statutory rape, have nearly doubled over the last five years - from over 160 cases five years ago to 300 cases this year.
Prof Woon said there could be more, as these were just cases that were reported.
Remember Aware's Comprehensive Sexual Education (CSE) Programme?
Remember how 12 year old girls were taught to have sex?
Has not AWARE implicitly been encouraging underage girls to be complicit in crime?
"Modern" sex educators appear more eager to teach "safe" sex more than anything else. (Note the terms "safe" or "safer" sex is actually a misnomer, because it actually only reduces the chances of STI and Aids, which hardly means it is safe.)
These educators do not stop and think that by teaching safe sex, they may be encouraging underage teens to commit crime. It is no different from teaching these underage teens how to binge "safely", without teaching them that underage persons purchasing or consuming alcohol is against the law.
Because of the "liberal" and not so responsible attitude these "modern" educators hold, they pass on the "values" that having sex is part of growing up and about everyone should try it, because it is fun, fun, fun.
Never mind about morals, never mind the hazards (the Magic Condom works miracles!) - and definitely never mind the law.
As it turns out, nothing, but NOTHING, beats good old traditional abstinence and "sex is for the married only" programme. Morals would be taught. The law would be taught.
Safe sex propagators will argue that if safe sex programme is taught properly, fewer teenagers would run foul of the law. But it can also be argued that if abstinence programme be taught properly, no teenager would run foul.
I am not saying we should not teach safe sex. I am saying that we must teach them good old traditional abstinence and morals as well.
"Modern" sex educators appear more eager to teach "safe" sex more than anything else. (Note the terms "safe" or "safer" sex is actually a misnomer, because it actually only reduces the chances of STI and Aids, which hardly means it is safe.)
These educators do not stop and think that by teaching safe sex, they may be encouraging underage teens to commit crime. It is no different from teaching these underage teens how to binge "safely", without teaching them that underage persons purchasing or consuming alcohol is against the law.
Because of the "liberal" and not so responsible attitude these "modern" educators hold, they pass on the "values" that having sex is part of growing up and about everyone should try it, because it is fun, fun, fun.
Never mind about morals, never mind the hazards (the Magic Condom works miracles!) - and definitely never mind the law.
As it turns out, nothing, but NOTHING, beats good old traditional abstinence and "sex is for the married only" programme. Morals would be taught. The law would be taught.
Safe sex propagators will argue that if safe sex programme is taught properly, fewer teenagers would run foul of the law. But it can also be argued that if abstinence programme be taught properly, no teenager would run foul.
I am not saying we should not teach safe sex. I am saying that we must teach them good old traditional abstinence and morals as well.
Posts
74 comments:
stop asking for more abstinence, this kind of concept is what's causing the population decline, nobody is producing because when they are young, they are trained to think that sex is unnatural(against some laws).
Asking for more abstinence is not causing the population to decline.
Education IS the cause for population decline. Nowadays more and more married couples choose not to have children because they feel that they won't make good parents.
We are looking at the effects CSE education. No doubt about it.
Whatever excuses given to promote 'safe sex'/explain the malady it caused only seeks to divert the fault to someone/somewhere else but the CSE.
What happened in the UK as a result of CSE is happening here. We shouldn't wait 10 years like the British in order to do something about the 'safe sex' propaganda.
Abstinence has been proven to work.
'Safe sex' propaganda has been proven to encourage more sex among kids.
No lies can hide that.
Teaching "Safe Sex" to teens is teaching kids to commit crime "safely". That's all to it. It doesn't help keep them from trying out sexual activities.
All those involved in Sex Ed Programme who advocate "Safe Sex" need to acknowledge this fact and face the reality and not give any excuses. They are encouraging a crime by teaching "safe sex" to teens! What makes those advocates think that by teaching "Safe Sex" the teens will practice those safe techniques? Aren't the abortion rates still increasing with such teaching from the sneaky CSE over the years until they were "uncovered"?
Frederick. Can you pls explain the population decline in the liberal 'safe sex' societies in the west.
So federick, you think the young should lend a helping hand to the adults who can't or refuse to procreate by having babies out of wedlock, when they are way too young to be parents?
Or do you advocate that taxpayers bear the costs of bringing up unwanted babies while the kiddy parents themselves learn to grow up?
Or do you think unwanted babies can provide jobs in the abortion industry?
Or is it because these kids can produce babies that can be adopted by lesbian and gay couples?
Is that the long term plan, besides availing more young boys and girls for sexual services of adults?
What dismays me is how these sex 'education' does not teach values. It is like telling a soldier how to use a gun, but does not tell the soldier the appropriate circumstance he should use it.
The right sex education in my personal opinion should be one that teaches our kids that homosexuality is WRONG and is against procreation, and they should seek help (and also knowing where to get help) whenever they have such thoughts coming up their mind.
Blaming sex education is truly missing the point when most of our kids had not received any sex education.
What is most shocking is where the kids are having their sex.
THEY ARE DOING IT AT HOME!
Where is the supervision by their parents who are totally oblivious to what is happening at their homes and give way too much freedom to their children while not impacting the right moral values concerning BGR and sexuality?
Such irresponsible parents should be blamed and punished severely for their chidren's sexual misconduct.
Parents definitely must put in efforts to bring up their children with a moral and ethical compass. But the counter that parents are wrong in failing to pick up that people are covertly coming into schools to spread amoral teachings is too much.
It is like saying that a girl is at fault for being sexually assaulted for walking in a remote location.
>>But the counter that parents are wrong in failing to pick up that people are covertly coming into schools to spread amoral teachings is too much.
<<
see how easily those truly responsible for their chidren's misconduct are quick to to blame everyone else except themselves when thing goes terribly wrong.
'>>But the counter that parents are wrong in failing to pick up that people are covertly coming into schools to spread amoral teachings is too much.
<<
see how easily those truly responsible for their chidren's misconduct are quick to to blame everyone else except themselves when thing goes terribly wrong.'
See how easily those truly amoral are quick to blame everyone else except themselves when their misdeeds are exposed.
>>See how easily those truly amoral are quick to blame everyone else except themselves when their misdeeds are exposed.<<
So u are telling me the state, the schools, the society should be the ones responsible for their children's misdeed when their children misbehaved under their guidance (or should i say "lack of guidance and supervision")
>>But the counter that parents are wrong in failing to pick up that people are covertly coming into schools to spread amoral teachings is too much.
<<
Let not forget that if people can covertly go into schools to spread immoral teachings, a whole lot of ppl should be responsible.
MOE can be forgiven for not knowing but what about the school principals, the teachers-in-charge of employing the external facilitator for sex education and the form teachers? How can they be ignorant?
The schools and the ppl in charge of overseeing the sexual education programme should be named, shamed and demoted for negligence.
'Let not forget that if people can covertly go into schools to spread immoral teachings, a whole lot of ppl should be responsible.
MOE can be forgiven for not knowing but what about the school principals, the teachers-in-charge of employing the external facilitator for sex education and the form teachers? How can they be ignorant?
The schools and the ppl in charge of overseeing the sexual education programme should be named, shamed and demoted for negligence.'
That is one issue. What about the offenders?
"What about the offenders?"
What offenders?
Offenders cannot be held accountable because those other people allowed them to do it.
Just like thieves cannot be guilty because the house owners left their windows wide open.
Just like liars cannot be blamed if you believe them.
"The schools and the ppl in charge of overseeing the sexual education programme should be named, shamed and demoted for negligence."
What about parents who assumed their kids were in good hands?
"It is like saying that a girl is at fault for being sexually assaulted for walking in a remote location."
Actually she is partly at fault for walking where danger lurks. Same with girls who wear provocative clothes.
Our parents taught us that we should avoid dark, deserted places at night.
Do parents teach their kids those things nowadays? Or are kids becoming defiantly disobedient?
"What is most shocking is where the kids are having their sex."
Please lah. I see kids fondling each other ever so often in the void decks.
So, is our Home Team or the Town Council responsible?
CSE is the main cause of liberal attitudes in our young. What to expect if CSE says homosexuality is normal and it is okay to experiment with sex to find your orientation?
Deflecting the blame to others (though their are partly responsible for allowing it to happen due to neglect) would truly be missing the point.
Why are we running round in circles?
Clearly it is a multi-factorial problem.
But let's not pretend that the offenders who slipped into the schools are innocent.
"...nobody is producing because when they are young, they are trained to think that sex is unnatural(against some laws)."
Really? Says who?
Nobody who has a sound mind will say sex is unnatural, but homosexuality definitely is abnormal, against natural laws.
John, you are right we are going round in circles. That is what they want us to do.
So, let agree on this - the culprit is the CSE (propagators) and should be trashed.
The rest of the parties involved are sleeping on the job. They should wake up and do something to compensate for their negligence or get the boot (employees)/shut up and sit down (parents).
>>CSE is the main cause of liberal attitudes in our young. What to expect if CSE says homosexuality is normal and it is okay to experiment with sex to find your orientation?<<
This must be the most ridiculous thing i had heard!
AWARE CSE was only offered in 13 schools. So tell me how the program was able to influence those who did not even attended it?
"CSE is the main cause of liberal attitudes in our young. What to expect if CSE says homosexuality is normal and it is okay to experiment with sex to find your orientation?"
sweeping statement much? dont learn from solo bear, sycophants.
Sneaky CSE offered in only 13 schools? How many years already? How many kids have been brain-washed? Multiply the effect what do you get? Damage beyond estimation!
"This must be the most ridiculous thing i had heard!"
Tsk, tsk, tsk. So defensive. Where does it say "Aware's CSE"? Aware has copyright to "CSE" so we cannot use "CSE"?
They say the guilty ones are always the ones to cry foul first.
Sweeping defence indeed!
"Sneaky CSE offered in only 13 schools? How many years already? How many kids have been brain-washed? Multiply the effect what do you get? Damage beyond estimation!"
Haha! Not only that, they pwned themselves by "owning" up to the "CSE" as "Aware's CSE".
Do we hear other CSE vendors howling "sycophant" in defence?
It is so funny to see parents pointing all over the place except themselves. They would give all sorts of excuses saying they need to focus on career and making money to feed the family. Raising a kid is not only about feeding, it is also about imparting right morale values, educate them and making sure they grow to become a useful person to the society. Who will be more responsible than the parents. If the parents could not set an example to be responsible, how could teens learn to be responsible to their actions? Today's teens are maturing at younger age, and even to the extent of thinking 'casual sex' is normal or even try to 'solicit for sex' to get money. If the teens are too young to be punish, we should punish the parents for neglecting their responsibility for not teaching their teens well.
All you hypocritical free sex propagators, listen up now. Of course it is parents' responsibility to look after their own children. No one is denying that. But this is where YOUR HYPOCRISY is exposed.
When conservative parents push for abstinence only programmes, control and censorship on the media, you, the free sex propagators hypocritically lobby hard and campaign for "safe sex" education, more open sex in media, and even lampooning conservatives as outdated for their views.
Then when you get your odious programmes that celebrate free sex, anal sex, gay sex and other types of sex that drills into the minds of the young - and that influences the young - which in turn alarms parents and hence, they point out to you the harm you've caused - you hypocritically tell parents its their responsibility.
Well, well, well. That's exactly what conservatives have been telling you, ain't it, Hypocrites?
That kids are our responsibility and that you Bloody Hypocrites should take off your dirty hands off children, isn't it?
Now go and screw yourselves silly if you want to. Get STD and Aids if you want to. But know that children are OFF YOUR F**KING LIMITS.
So when conservatives tell you that "safe sex" education is nothing but a celebration of free sex, and that the media and the law should clamp down, censor and control messages that celebrate free sex so that children are protected, keep your f**king hands off and know that it is off your f**king limits.
In other words, it is parents' responsibility and hence yes, parents should decide. NOT YOU.
Well said, Solo Bear. Stop their twisting and turning right in their filthy tracks.
Oh please Solo Bear,
Stop huffing and puffing around when you can't even defend your views in person. Because you know that if you were forced to analyse and verbally defend your views and cannot read selectively, you will be exposed for the fraud that you are.
C'mon, put some credibility behind those absurd views.
Everyone only has to look at the No to Rape thread to see that you are a coward who runs away when challenged.
:)
Sypher
Hey, that was a real good one, your latest comment. Parents have are/have bee doing something after all.
Got the hypocrites so dumbfounded that their troll has to start issuing empty challenges and taunts.
All rise and applause, please :D
Ugh those typos...sorry.
>>When conservative parents push for abstinence only programmes, control and censorship on the media, you, the free sex propagators hypocritically lobby hard and campaign for "safe sex" education, more open sex in media, and even lampooning conservatives as outdated for their views.
Then when you get your odious programmes that celebrate free sex, anal sex, gay sex and other types of sex that drills into the minds of the young - and that influences the young - which in turn alarms parents and hence, they point out to you the harm you've caused - you hypocritically tell parents its their responsibility.
<<
This is so humorous :D
If parents are so responsible, why is there is a need for a nationwide censorship and control of the mass media and Internet and a school sexuality programme by the state when it should be the duty of parent to control and monitor their children's access to the mass media and Internet and impart the right moral values on BGR and sexuality.
It is precisely the fact that modern parents are not doing any of these that have led to the current sad state of affair and the need for the state to introduce sex education programme in schools. However, it will be foolish to think that a 1 day sex education programme is going to be any effective without the continual guidance and monitoring by parents.
Basically, modern parents are pushing all their responsibilities on upbringing of their children to the state, schools and tuition classes. But when the state, schools and tution classes failed to meet their specific expectation on education of their chidren, they will start whining and crying that the state, the schools and the tuition classes are poor nanny.
What a irony!
anon at 3 November 2009 7:11 AM
well said!
First the Christians, then the Muslims, now they attack the parents to divert attention away from their guilty acts.
The logic that if parents are responsible in parenting, the government would not need to intervene is warped and lacks depth of understanding about the complexities of parenting.
Parents cannot control the environment, internet, media etc. their kids are exposed to but the government can, and hence the call for the government to do something about it.
Or are they advocating that parents treat their children like prisoners, deprive them of interaction with the outside world or engage private investigators to tail them 27/7?
Get this straight, the 'safe sex' propaganda is one issue. Parenting is another.
This topic is about the sex ed programme, not parenting. If you insist that parents should be responsible to educating their kids about sex, then don't push the sex ed programme in schools.
You can't shove sex down their throats and when it is proven to make matters worse, blame parents for not doing their part.
Who knows, if it has worked, those propagators will turn up in full glory to claim all credit and insist that parents should not intervene.
In short, if you want parents to do their job, then stop the 'safe sex' propaganda.
And don't even try to rationalise that it is because of parents' failure that 'sex ed' is necessary.
Because 'safe sex' condom talk has not only failed, it made the situation worse, just as it has happened in the UK.
>>Get this straight, the 'safe sex' propaganda is one issue. Parenting is another.<<
you are the one who need to get it straight. It is not the fault of sex education since most students in Singapore have not attended any "safe sex" education in school at all. In fact, you see news articles, cited by solo bear, asking for more sex education in school, not less.
>>If you insist that parents should be responsible to educating their kids about sex, then don't push the sex ed programme in schools.<<
What are u going to do about the rising problem of teenage pregnancy and STI without sex ed programme in schools and parents not doing a good job of educating their children about sex.
"However, it will be foolish to think that a 1 day sex education programme is going to be any effective without the continual guidance and monitoring by parents."
In other words, they want the sex ed programme in schools on the pretext that it will help, but disclaim that the sex ed programme will actually help.
Much like the snail oil man trying to sell you snake oil because he claims you need it but it may not address your need.
What double talk and irony!
>>Or are they advocating that parents treat their children like prisoners, deprive them of interaction with the outside world or engage private investigators to tail them 27/7?<<
No one is asking you to treat your children as a prisoner. How hard is it for you as a parent to restrict your children's access to computer and tv and ensure that your children is at home after school instead of loitering in the shopping malls and be a potential juvenile delinquent (a call to the home telephone or leave them in the care of a guardian)
Dun you find it ridiculous a 13 yr old girl is all alone at home and can even bring a total stranger to her home for sex without the knowledge of her parents?
"It is not the fault of sex education since most students in Singapore have not attended any "safe sex" education in school at all."
You must have swept past the figures on rising teenage sex in recent years highlighted in the papers. Only in recent years has sex ed been introduced in schools, along with the condom miracle propaganda.
In addition, get this straight:
Exposure to internet, media is the cause you say? Sure, the 'safe sex' message has been plastered everywhere in those places, even in an NIE lecturer's office.
Please don't try to snake out by confining 'safe sex' education as only in schools. The propagators have been spewing that trash all over the place in full view of our kids, wherever they go.
Don't you know, (I am sure the propagators do), education goes beyond the classroom?
3 November 2009 1:28 PM
Are you a parent? Do you know what it entails and what priorities, activities parents have to juggle/struggle with within a limited amount of time?
Your must have been very fortunate - parents are with you 24/7 because you must have them with you 24/7, otherwise, you are incapable of taking care of yourself. Leave you alone and you will start an orgy at home.
Do you know that children can be disobedient and rebellious despite parents' efforts?
Stop the sex ed propaganda if you so think that parents are fully responsible for their kids.
You can't meddle and blame the mess on the parents when you started the mess.
"Dun you find it ridiculous a 13 yr old girl is all alone at home and can even bring a total stranger to her home for sex without the knowledge of her parents?"
It is ridiculous, but not necessarily the parents fault because it is very unlikely that the parents will teach her to do that.
Most likely, she must have learned how healthy sex is and being young and gullible, and with access to total privacy at home, decided to experiment with sex. Okay with a stranger as long as it is "safe" yah?
Now, where might she have learned that from?
>>Exposure to internet, media is the cause you say? <<
That should be porn instead of safe sex, isn't it *LOL*
>>Sure, the 'safe sex' message has been plastered everywhere in those places, even in an NIE lecturer's office.
<<
rubbish! I dun think u can find safe sex posters and adverts in many places except nightclubs, bars and hospitals. Seeing how a safe sex poster in a NIE office can create a uproar, I cant imagine the howls and protest if the same poster find its way into a children playground and shopping malls.
>>Stop the sex ed propaganda if you so think that parents are fully responsible for their kids.<<
It can be done if all parents are responsible enuff to take the effort to monitor and restrict their children's activities and teach them the right moral values on BGR and sexuality.
"That should be porn instead of safe sex, isn't it *LOL*"
Goes to show, you only have eyes for porn.
You must have only Googled for porn and not safe sex.
"rubbish! I dun think u can find safe sex posters and adverts in many places except nightclubs, bars and hospitals. Seeing how a safe sex poster in a NIE office can create a uproar, I cant imagine the howls and protest if the same poster find its way into a children playground and shopping malls."
So teenagers do not fake their ages to sneak into nightspots? Wow, utopia. So, they do not go to hospitals? Wow, nirvana.
If no one makes any noise, we will surely see those posters on the streets and malls.
Even censorship of nude/sex scenes are drawing howls from the sex-obsessed. If no one shouts back, it will surely be all hell breaking loose.
"It can be done if all parents are responsible enuff to take the effort to monitor and restrict their children's activities and teach them the right moral values on BGR and sexuality."
Whether parents are responsible enough is none of your business.
If you volunteer to take on their role, no gatecrash your way into their territory touting your miracle solutions, then own up to the consequences of your failure and not try to push the blame to parents.
>>Do you know that children can be disobedient and rebellious despite parents' efforts?<<
See how easily it is to blame everything else except themselves for their failure as parents when their children turned rebellious and disobedient when it is their fault that their children were never disciplined and pampered like little princes and princesses from young. By the time these young princes and princesses are in their teens, it is too late to discipline them and it is now the fault of the state and schools.
3 November 2009 1:57 PM
How do you know that the parents did not try their best? A sweeping assumption.
Oh, you assume, cos that will put the blame on parents, not the sex ed programme.
Know why these people are talking about parents when the topic is about the shortcomings of the Sex Ed programme?
Another diversion tactic.
Lunch over.
>>So teenagers do not fake their ages to sneak into nightspots? Wow, utopia. So, they do not go to hospitals? Wow, nirvana.
<<
LOL Whose fault is it that these youngsters can be out in the street late into the night to even sneak into nightspots? Why isn't there a curfew at home? When they are back home with smell of liquor and cigarette , how come their parents totally ignorant?
'See how easily it is to blame everything else except themselves for their failure as parents when their children turned rebellious and disobedient when it is their fault that their children were never disciplined and pampered like little princes and princesses from young. By the time these young princes and princesses are in their teens, it is too late to discipline them and it is now the fault of the state and schools.
3 November 2009 1:57 PM'
Whatever the possible failings of some parents, that does not give amoral people the right to go to schools and tell children it is ok to be sexually promiscuous or homosexual.
"LOL Whose fault is it that these youngsters can be out in the street late into the night to even sneak into nightspots?"
Oh, many possibilities. Use your brain to explore those possibilities will ya?
"Why isn't there a curfew at home?"
Because it's children's right to their liberty mah. They are grown up enough even to learn about sex you know?
Why are these people forgetting what they taught the kids?
"When they are back home with smell of liquor and cigarette , how come their parents totally ignorant?"
You sure the parents are totally ignorant/did nothing about it?
that's right, it is the parents' fault that they did not detect deceptive people from telling their children that it is ok to sleep around and be homosexual.
Satisfied?
So many comments.
Almost all anonymous.
Are there only 2 people arguing only?
'So many comments.
Almost all anonymous.
Are there only 2 people arguing only?
3 November 2009 3:23 PM'
So many words, almost all useless.
Is there any purpose in posting?
Wake up call for (some) parents:
If you entrust sex education of your children to these Sex Ed proponents - you are giving them a license to do whatever they wish to your child and if anything goes wrong, these same "do-good"-ers will point the finger back at you for the mess they have created.
"that's right, it is the parents' fault that they did not detect deceptive people from telling their children that it is ok to sleep around and be homosexual.
Satisfied?"
Thumbs up. Now see if the Sex Ed experts are able to take responsibility for their mistakes.
"Is there any purpose in posting?"
Loosen up lah. Just some lunch time/afternoon tea entertainment.
Again, no one is saying that it is not parents' responsibility. Please note that I said that it has always been conservatives who have been drilling that we need to teach morals in sex education. I did not say that it was parents who said so.
Looooong before this mess came to Singapore, it was already prevalent in the West (America, parts of Europe like Scandinavian countries, France etc) that children were having free sex. So it was only logical and definitely foreseeable that if the trend continued in Singapore, all the free sex culture will lead Singapore to be in the same mess. Some parents thought it was far fetched then. Well, it has happened and these parents who did not take that warning seriously, are now paying the price.
I doubt anyone is arguing on the point above.
Now what is really despicable, is that free sex propagators (including gays who are out to brainwash youngsters) have exploited this complacent attitude amongst some parents. They waited like hawks and when they see that these youngsters are not guided, go in for the swoop.
So while some parents can be blamed for complacency, it is these scoundrels who take full advantage, and when the same parents realize what has happened, these very same scoundrels take cover and wash their bloodied hands.
For the last time, we don't need scoundrels to tell how our children need to be taught. If you want to pass STD and Aids among yourselves, be my guest. But know that children are off your bloody limits.
Now leave parents, teachers, MOE and the Law to sort the mess you scoundrels have been scavenging on.
Bunk off and stay off our children!
>>
You are the one who need to get it straight. It is not the fault of sex education since most students in Singapore have not attended any "safe sex" education in school at all. In fact, you see news articles, cited by solo bear, asking for more sex education in school, not less.
>>
Me:
The issue here is not even about sex education per se. It is about the free sex propagators who instill in our society that everyone, including the young (be it through covert CSE programmes in schools or through other means) should celebrate free sex and that it is fun, fun, fun.
If you want to have your STD, Aids and fun, do it at your own risk. Don't go round telling others to join your suicide mission.Don't go round saying that it is a good and in-thing to do. And definitely don't try to tell children that what you do is pure good natural fun.
"It is not the fault of sex education since most students in Singapore have not attended any "safe sex" education in school at all. In fact, you see news articles, cited by solo bear, asking for more sex education in school, not less."
Right, it is not the fault of sex education, but that of the CSE.
Abstinence can also be a form of sex education - that sex is meant for responsible adults, not kiddies.
Solo bear,
if u despises the West so much, why are u planing to migrate to Canada?
Wouldn't consecutive Islamic countries in the Middle East be a perfect place for your retirement?
'If you want to have your STD, Aids and fun, do it at your own risk. Don't go round telling others to join your suicide mission.Don't go round saying that it is a good and in-thing to do. And definitely don't try to tell children that what you do is pure good natural fun.'
These shameless people would never admit to their guilt.
Copyright (!) is the reason why the nefarious program is not made public. That is a good one.
'"Is there any purpose in posting?"
Loosen up lah. Just some lunch time/afternoon tea entertainment.'
Yah man, let the sex activists continue to entertain us with their funny excuses why they want children to poke organs into each others' anuses.
"......It is not just the girls, but the boys (too)... male prostitute who went on the Internet, gay chatroom to earn money......"
Demand created by gays.
Supply from male prostitute (boys).
Is that's why gays want homosexuality to be taught to young boys?
Where are the humanists?
Where are the human rights activists?
Why is there a deafening silence on male prostitution (boys) to gays?!?!
Wonder why the english papers was rather silent on a report made by the chinese papers on sex ehancement drugs sold opening in gay spa? hmmmmm
Apparently Today did a survey on gay spas and found something similar about sex drugs.
It was published on Sunday but the archives are only accessible members.
What kind of society is ours turning into - where promiscuity, even infidelity, is celebrated but someone's virginity has turned into the butt of a joke by the sexually liberal?
LONDON, Nov 9 (Reuters) - Reports of women carrying out sex attacks on children have soared in the last five years, a British charity said on Monday.
ChildLine said there had been a 132 percent rise in reports of female sex abuse made to its telephone helpline, compared to a 27 percent rise in abuse by men in the same five-year period.
"Most sex abuse calls to ChildLine come from girls saying they were assaulted by a male," said Sue Minto, head of the helpline.
"But a growing number of callers now say they were sexually abused by a female. Many would find it shocking that any woman - let alone a mother - can sexually assault a child. But they do."
Is there data in Singapore to show that "Modern" Sex Education Programs really work?
Let's look at STIs statistics.
In 1978, Singapore has ~2.3 million people. STI incidence was at an all time high.
STI incidence then decline over the years - without the help of so called Comprehensive Sex Education.
Most importantly, note that population is increasing, but incidence per 100,000 is decreasing.
How is all this possible without the so called Comprehensive Sex Education?
There's something interesting.
From 2003, STI incidence in females (10-19 Age Group) starts jumping.
Now... When did CSE started appearing in girls' schools?
CM, thanks for your analyses here and elsewhere, which highlighted a trend/correlation between CSE and STIs.
Unfortunately, instead of acknowledging that CSE is the most likely cause, advocators have insisted otherwise, with scarcely any data to support their claims.
The MOE (Ministers) too...maybe they should produce figures that prove CSE actually works instead of just bulldozing through with their assumption that CSE is the miracle solution for curbing problems with teenage sex.
It's time for the MOE to reassess their conclusions based on actually performance factors of the CSE so far, instead of listening to wishy-washy tales from the so-called counselling experts who push for condom-ed.
"Many would find it shocking that any woman - let alone a mother - can sexually assault a child. But they do."
Sign of a very sick world or rather world with very sick people.
Post a Comment